Legal Opinion
Ream v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 9, 1984No. 83-1477PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
449 So.2d 960 (1984)
Donald REAM and Curtis Ream, Appellants,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-1477.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
May 9, 1984.
Bernard Berman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Max Rudmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
DOWNEY, Judge.
This is an appeal by codefendants from an order denying their Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motions for post conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. In their motions for post conviction relief defendants contended that their lawyers (one succeeded the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Randall Wilford PricepaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- John Vincent Rimanich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Arthur Sena, 24848 v. Levi Romero, Warden, and the Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Cooley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Ream v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bass v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Bullard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Freber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Lonergan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Ingraham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.