Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Texas (In Re Gandy)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
Decided July 18, 2005No. 19-30967PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOINT MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge.
On April 22, 2005, this Court issued an order in In re Gandy, 1 finding that the automatic stay did not apply to a prepetition state court lawsuit brought by governmental units against Mr. Gandy. On April 29, 2005, this Court denied an Application for a Temporary Restraining Order in Diaz v. State of Texas, 2 finding that the automatic stay did not apply to a prepetition state court suit brought by the State of Texas against Ms. Diaz. The two decisions involve substantially similar questions of law. This Joint Memorandum Opinion provides…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Browning v. NavarroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- National Labor Relations Board v. Edward Cooper Painting, Inc., and Cooper & Cooper Painting, an Alter EgoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Nicolet, Inc. And Turner and Newall, Plc v. Turner & Newall Plc. Appeal of Nicolet, Inc. Appeal of Turner & Newall PlcCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Halo Wireless, Inc. v. Alenco Communications, Inc. (In Re Halo Wireless, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- In Re SalazarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- Graziani v. RandolphSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Attorney General of New Jersey v. Patriot Enterprises Worldwide, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Graziani v. RandolphSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.