Legal Opinion

Smith v. Burrillville Town Council

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 9, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

The only question presented for decision in this case is whether the return to a common law writ of certiorari should set out the evidence upon which the judgment or finding complained of was based. This question was practically answered in the negative by this court in the case of Moroney v. City Council of Pawtucket, decided at the present session, (ante, p. 2) in which case it was held that certiorari brings up nothing for review except the record proper of the proceeding, of which the evidence before the tribunal below, strictly speaking, forms no part and which it is, therefore, under no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farmington River Water Power Co. v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. In re License to CarlsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Gross's LicenseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Stone v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Whittaker v. Village of VeniceIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Augusta v. LosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Bassi v. Zoning Bd. of Review of City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. O'Brien v. Mayor and AldermenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API