Legal Opinion

J. C. Penney Company, Inc. and Myron E. Ullman III v. Everett M. Ozenne, Derivatively on Behalf of J.C. Penney Company, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided December 22, 2014No. 05-13-01601-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Myers

This case concerns an award of $3.1 million for the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and expenses in a shareholder derivative action. The parties settled the suit and agreed that if the trial court awarded the plaintiffs attorneys their fees and expenses, that fee award “will compensate Plaintiffs Counsel for the results achieved in the Action and the risks of undertaking the prosecution of the Action on a contingent basis.”

J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Myron E. Ullman III, Michael T. Theilmann, Thomas M. Nealon, Robert B. Cavanaugh, William A. Ackman, Thomas J.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bowie Memorial Hospital v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equipment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amazing Paws v. Melissa Pedraza, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2026
  2. Robert L. Moody, Jr. v. National Western Life Insurance Company and National Western Life Group, Inc. , Ross Rankin Moody, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API