Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Apfel

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 15, 1999No. 98-2684PublishedCited by 137 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Thelma Wilson, acting on behalf of her infant daughter Anastasia El-Amin, appeals the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of supplemental security income benefits to Anastasia. Anastasia suffers from sickle cell anemia, which she claims entitles her to receive benefits. However, the Social Security Administration’s administrative law judge (“ALJ”) found that Anastasia did not suffer from a “severe impairment” as is necessary to qualify for supplemental security income benefits under the Social Security Act. The Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council let the ALJ’s ruling stand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Tammy GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Jamerson v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Justin Nelson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Erickson Meko CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  3. Brenda A. Wind v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Shinn v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Mullin v. ApfelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API