Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 23, 2007No. 06-14602PublishedCited by 1,103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
The main issue in this appeal is whether a federal court must consider evidence first presented to the Social Security Appeals Council when it decides whether to “enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the [Commissioner’s denial of benefits], with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Lillian Ingram appeals a judgment affirming the denial of her application for disability benefits, and she argues that the district court erroneously refused to consider evidence of mental disability that she first presented to the Appeals…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,103 opinions
- Donnell Mitchell v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Joyce Hargress v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Cornelius Washington v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Marcia Bonavia Samuels v. Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Sonya Hunter v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
1,098 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.