Legal Opinion

State v. Mailman

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2010No. 31,092PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

{1} A jury convicted Defendant David Mailman by a general verdict of driving while intoxicated (DWI) based on alternative theories of actually driving while intoxicated or being in actual physical control of a vehicle while intoxicated. Defendant appeals, arguing that his conviction must be reversed because his vehicle was inoperable and, therefore, he was not in actual physical control of it, and because there was insufficient evidence to convict him of actually driving while intoxicated. We hold that Defendant’s conviction, to the extent it may have been based on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. SalgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. ArrendondoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. SommersMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Town of Taos v. WisdomNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. VentoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API