Legal Opinion

People v. Haensel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1920No. 13176PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Writ of Error to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Hugo Pam, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Plaintiff in error, Arthur E. Haensel, was convicted of the murder of his wife, Cecelia Haensel, and his punishment was fixed' at death. The defense was insanity and alibi. He prosecutes this writ of error to reverse the judgment of the criminal court of Cook county on the grounds that the court erred in the admission of evidence and in the giving and refusing of instructions.

Plaintiff in error was born in Chicago and was twenty-eight years old at the time of the trial. When he was twelve years old he was placed in the Cook County Parental School on account of truancy and remained there two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jamison v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Dacey v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Henry v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People v. MosesIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Lilly v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. LloydIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  2. The People v. RileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. The People v. WeisbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  4. The People v. AshleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  5. The People v. SleezerIllinois Supreme Court · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API