Legal Opinion
Bruett v. REAL PROPERTY KNOWN AS 18328
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 21, 1998No. 36214-3-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Appellants Roger W. Bruett, Chief, Washington State Patrol, and Larry Kalsbeek, Lynnwood Chief of Police, (collectively “Appellants”) brought a civil forfeiture action against the Respondent property, owned by Mr. Sam O. Feagin and Mrs. Paula Roberta Feagin, under RCW 69.50.505, Washington’s drug forfeiture statute. The law-enforcement agencies served a summons, notice of intended forfeiture, and other filings, but failed to serve notice of the arrest warrant in rem as required by the statute.
Upon motion, the trial court dismissed the action against Mr. Feagin’s interest in the property on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moen v. Spokane City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. GravesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- City of Walla Walla v. $401,333.44Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- City of Spokane v. RothwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- City of Spokane v. RothwellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.