State v. Dowdy
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crothers, Justice.
*110 [¶1] Alexis Dowdy appeals from a judgment entered after she conditionally pled guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol. Dowdy argues the arresting officer improperly added inaccurate and coercive language to the statutorily required implied consent advisory, and she did not voluntarily consent to chemical testing. The district court found Dowdy was read a complete implied consent advisory and she voluntarily consented to chemical testing. We affirm.
I
[¶2] North Dakota Highway Patrol Officer Jeremy Rost stopped Dowdy in Bismarck for making an improper turn. Dowdy…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SyvertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Dickinson v. HewsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- City of Dickinson v. HewsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. FleckensteinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Bismarck v. VagtsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. BolmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. DowdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019