Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. Hemric

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1982No. 8123SC654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

We begin our analysis of this case with a statement of the applicable law as found in the pertinent statutes and cases construing them.

N.C.G.S. 28A-19-15 provides the mechanism by which a disputed claim against a decedent’s estate may be referred. The finding of the arbitrators under this section is equivalent to a judgment, but “may be impeached in any proceeding against the personal representative” for fraud or collusion. See In re Estate of Reynolds, 221 N.C. 449, 20 S.E. 2d 348 (1942); Lassiter v. Upchurch, 107 N.C. 411, 12 S.E. 63 (1890).

Under N.C.G.S. 28A-17-1,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baker v. Carter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Wadford v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. In Re the Administration of the Estate of ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Person v. . MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. McNair v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re: HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. In re: HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API