Holcomb v. Hemric
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.
We begin our analysis of this case with a statement of the applicable law as found in the pertinent statutes and cases construing them.
N.C.G.S. 28A-19-15 provides the mechanism by which a disputed claim against a decedent’s estate may be referred. The finding of the arbitrators under this section is equivalent to a judgment, but “may be impeached in any proceeding against the personal representative” for fraud or collusion. See In re Estate of Reynolds, 221 N.C. 449, 20 S.E. 2d 348 (1942); Lassiter v. Upchurch, 107 N.C. 411, 12 S.E. 63 (1890).
Under N.C.G.S. 28A-17-1,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baker v. Carter.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Wadford v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- In Re the Administration of the Estate of ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Person v. . MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- McNair v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re: HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- In re: HarperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020