Legal Opinion

Thomas Todd v. Vermont Mutual Insurance Company & A

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 2016No. 2015-0233PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConboy, J.

In this declaratory judgment proceeding, the petitioner, Thomas Todd, appeals an order of the Superior Court {Nicolosi, J.) denying his cross-motions for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the respondents, Vermont Mutual Insurance Company (Vermont Mutual) and Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover). The trial court ruled that neither respondent had a duty to provide a defense to Todd in a civil stalking action. We affirm.

I. Background

The summary judgment record reflects the following pertinent facts. Todd, a Massachusetts resident, is a member of the New Hampshire Chapter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tessier v. RockefellerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Porter v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Nichols v. Great American Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Red Ball Leasing, Inc. And American Red Ball Transit Company, Inc. v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Motorists Commercial Mutual Insurance Company v. HartwellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  2. Nautilus Insurance Company v. Washington Ferreira, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
  3. Nautilus Insurance Company v. FerreiraDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
  4. Patriot Insurance Company v. Holmes Carpet Center, LLC, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API