Legal Opinion

Taffel v. Taffel

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1943PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.

The existence of the decree of divorce rendered to the husband in the State of Florida effectually bars the granting at this time of plaintiff wife’s motion in this separation action for temporary alimony and counsel fee. (Williams v. North Carolina, 317 U. S. 287.) That decree, reciting jurisdiction and dissolving the marriage, must be given full faith and credit unless and until vacated by direct application therein, or until successfully attacked collaterally for fraud in its procurement. It cannot be so attacked or questioned summarily on motion.

A further ground, precluding the granting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Galusha v. . GalushaNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Cain v. CainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Ascher v. AscherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  5. Grissler v. GrisslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shuart v. ShuartNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Lea v. LeaNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Aronson v. AronsonNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Holmes v. HolmesNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API