Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Platt

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 1874PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This was an action of deceit instituted by the appellants against L. B. Platt, H. S. Platt and J. B. Platt, as joint tort feasors. The plaintiffs were partners, under the firm name of Joseph B. Brinkley & Son, doing business in Baltimore city, as packers of canned oysters, fruit and vegetables. The three defendants were also partners, though not sued as such, in the same business in Baltimore, under the firm name of Platt & Co. The deceit alleged consisted of false representations made by the defendants to the plaintiffs respecting the financial standing and credit of the firm of Palm, De…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kimball v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  2. Hambleton v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Gurney v. TenneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Rent-A-Car Co. v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  4. Porter v. Greenbrier Quarry Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Brady v. Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API