Legal Opinion

Succession of Block

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 13, 1912No. 19,176PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; E. K. Skinner, Judge. In the matter of the succession of Charles B. Block. On appeal from a judgment admitting decedent’s will to probate.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

This is a proceeding for the probate of the will of the decedent. Instead of proceeding ex parte, the proponent took a rule on the legal heir of the decedent to show cause why the will should not be probated. The will is in the nuncupative by public act form. The legal heir, in alleging cause why it should not be probated, denied seriatim every one of the recitals made by the notary of compliance with the formalities prescribed by law for wills in that form. On the trial of the rule, the only evidence offered was the will itself. The proponent offered no other, and the defendant in rule…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Succession of TheriotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Reynolds v. CarrollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. Succession of TeteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  4. King v. VairinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of KillingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  2. Renfrow v. McCainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Talton v. ToddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Succession of PapaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Succession of McDermottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API