Legal Opinion

Succession of Tete

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1852PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of Assumption, Randall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The judgment of the court (Preston, J., not sitting in the cause from interest,) was pronounced by

Eustis, C. J.

This appeal is taken by certain judgment creditors of the succession of the late Auguste Tete, from a judgment of the Court of the Fifth District, by which a preference over their claims is accorded to the surviving *96wife, resulting from a receipt by her husband of his own notes, as the paraphernal property of the wife. A similar case, in the same succession, came before us in 1849, and it is reported in 4th Ann. 465, under the title of Slatter v. Tete.

The evidence in that case,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Templet v. BabbittSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. Succession of PurkertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Danielle Deon Dickerson Acurio v. Dr. Michael Thomas AcurioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2017
  4. Succession of BlockSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  5. Union Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Grand Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API