Cummings v. Minnesota Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
T. LANE WILSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on plaintiff Daniel Cummings’ claim filed pursuant to the Employee Retirement Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. against defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company (“Minnesota Life”). [Dkt. # 21, 22], Plaintiff, as beneficiary, alleges he was improperly denied accidental death benefits under a qualified employee benefit plan sponsored by defendant. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) & (3), the parties have consented to proceed before a United…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Jorita Padfield v. Aig Life Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Caldwell v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2017