Legal Opinion

American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 15, 1908No. 65PublishedCited by 36 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

NOYES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for the recovery of treble damages under the seventh section of the federal anti-trust statute (Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 210 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3202]).

The complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendant corporation was organized'in 1899, and thereafter at all times engaged in the business of import 'ng bananas into the United States from Central and South America; that in 1899 and subsequent years, for the purpose of *263monopolizing the banana trade between such countries, of regulating prices, controlling production, and preventing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Sugar Refining Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  2. Underhill v. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  3. Thomsen v. Union Castle Mail S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1971
  5. Robert H. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API