Pennsylvania Sugar Refining Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
NOYES, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for the recovery of treble damages under the seventh section of the federal anti-trust *256statute (Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 210 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3202]).
The complaint alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, had from the year 1883 to the year 1898 been engaged in the business of importing raw sugar from other states and foreign countries into the state of Pennsylvania, manufacturing it there into refined sugar, and exporting the manufactured product to other states and countries; that the plaintiff ceased…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. E. C. Knight Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Loewe v. LawlorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Herman Schwabe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United Leather Workers International Union, Local Lodge or Union No. 66 v. Herkert & Meisel Trunk Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.