Legal Opinion

Continental Bus System, Inc. v. Ansel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 10, 1952No. 12495PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

Appellee, Frank N. Ansel, recovered a judgment against Continental Bus System, Inc., for $509.31, being the value of certain baggage which was lost after being surrendered to the carrier for transportation. The carrier, as appellant, contends that the recovery should have been limited to $25, which it tendered into court.

This claim arose from interstate transportation, as appellee had purchased a ticket from Corpus Christi, Texas, to New York City, and was entitled to have his baggage carried to the point of his destination. The case is therefore controlled by Congressional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Express Co. v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. BeahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Calveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Metz Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. Nast v. San Antonio, U. & G. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muelder v. Western Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Shirazi v. Greyhound CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Zeidenberg v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1965
  4. Greyhound Corp. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API