Legal Opinion

Brading v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 24, 1929No. Docket No. 29815Published

Evidence held insufficient to how that a dividend declared by a corporation in 1922 was not a cash dividend, as determined by the Commissioner.

1Opinion of the Court

J. E. BRADING, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Brading v. Commissioner

Docket No. 29815.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

17 B.T.A. 436; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2296;

September 24, 1929, Promulgated

Evidence held insufficient to how that a dividend declared by a corporation in 1922 was not a cash dividend, as determined by the Commissioner.

R. R. Miller, Esq., for the petitioner.

T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

LITTLETON

The Commissioner determined a deficiency in income tax of $479.91 for 1922.

The deficiency arises from the action of the respondent in determining that a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  3. Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  4. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
  5. Crellin v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API