Brading v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
Evidence held insufficient to how that a dividend declared by a corporation in 1922 was not a cash dividend, as determined by the Commissioner.
1Opinion of the Court
J. E. BRADING, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Brading v. Commissioner
Docket No. 29815.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
17 B.T.A. 436; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2296;
September 24, 1929, Promulgated
Evidence held insufficient to how that a dividend declared by a corporation in 1922 was not a cash dividend, as determined by the Commissioner.
R. R. Miller, Esq., for the petitioner.
T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.
LITTLETON
The Commissioner determined a deficiency in income tax of $479.91 for 1922.
The deficiency arises from the action of the respondent in determining that a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
- Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Crellin v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.