People v. Leopold
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Correction Law § 168-n (3) requires the court fixing a sex offender’s risk level determination to “render an order setting forth . . . the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based.” Here, neither the Supreme Court nor the Appellate Division order set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law justifying the risk level determination. We therefore remit this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. BowlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. VegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. KempAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.