Legal Opinion
Uto v. Job Site Services Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 20, 2010No. CV 10-0529(SJF)(ETB)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge:
Before the court is the plaintiffs’ motion for a protective order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Specifically, plaintiffs seek a protective order with respect to certain of defendants’ document demands and interrogatory requests on the grounds that the discovery requests aim to gather information concerning plaintiffs’ immigration status. Plaintiffs assert that such information is prejudicial and irrelevant. For the following reasons, plaintiffs’ motion is granted.
Facts
Plaintiffs, Paulino Uto, Jose Edwin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Guy O. Dove, Iii, Spargos Mining Nl v. Atlantic Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Torres v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Cymaticolor Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Doe No. 2 v. KolkoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Rosas v. Alice's Tea Cup, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Melendez v. Primavera Meats, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Andrade v. WALGREENS-OPTIONCARE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Cazorla v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2012
- Alexis Garcia, Alvin Maldonado, Antonio Montiel, David Torres, Grevil Martinez, Josue Martinez, Luis Miguel Zaldivar, Luis Samuel Martinez, Luis Martinez Escoto, Stenford Andrew Mitchell, and Wandy Ramirez v. Padin Day Interior Group, LLC, and Ramiro Padin, individuallyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2026
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.