Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hedin v. Westdala Lutheran Church

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1938No. 6508Published

1Dissent

BUDGE, J.,

Dissenting in Part and Concurring in Part.— As will be observed from a reading of the majority opinion, paragraph 6 of the will of Johan Johannesson is held to be void upon the theory that the provisions thereof are uncertain and indefinite as to the identity of the beneficiaries as a class, and as to the time and manner of the disposition of the trust. It will be conceded, as it is in the majority opinion, that the authorities are not in harmony, and that support may be found to sustain both appellants’ and respondents’ contention. Upon an examination of the authorities upon both…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of ClaytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Minot v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. LittleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  4. Weber v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Welch v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API