Legal Opinion
Back v. Bowery Savings Bank
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis (David C.), J.
The defendant, a savings bank, moves under subdivision 1 of section 250 of the Banking Law to amend the proceedings by making one Fanny Back a party defendant and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper.
The plaintiff demands a denial of the motion upon the ground that the defendant has failed to comply with subdivision 5 of section 250 of the Banking Law.
The facts out of which the lawsuit arises are: On January 9, 1937, there was on deposit with the defendant The Bowery Savings Bank the sum of $658.53, standing in the plaintiff’s name in the account…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kittredge v. GrannisNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Steiner v. East River Savings InstitutionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- McGuire v. Auburn Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Simon v. HermannCity of New York Municipal Court · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Landrum v. Security Nat. Bank of RoswellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Community Volunteer Fire Co. v. City National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- Alberene Stone Co. v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1937