Medford Furniture & Hardware Co. v. Hanley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBand, J.
This is an action to recover for goods, wares and merchandise claimed to have been sold to defendant, and at his request to have been delivered to one Delin, who had contracted with defendant to construct a ditch on defendant’s premises, and to furnish and pay for all labor, material and supplies used in the construction of the ditch, and to hold defendant harmless therefrom. After alleging the corporate existence of the plaintiff, the cause of action is set forth in the complaint as follows:
“That during the year 1920, the defendant was engaged in the construction of a ditch on his premises…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Butler v. KemmererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Klimek v. PerisichOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Cook v. the MV WasaborgDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
- American State Bank v. RichendiferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Ballenger v. TillmanMontana Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.