Legal Opinion
Monica C. Simpkins, et al. v. Natalie Janette Booker
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 9, 2026No. 8:25-cv-03814Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MONICA C. SIMPKINS,et al., Plaintiffs, CaseNo. 25-cv-3814-ABA v. NATALIE JANETTE BOOKER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Monica and Lamonte Simpkins sued Defendant Natalie Booker in Maryland state court to evict her from their property that Ms. Booker was renting. Ms. Booker has removed the case to this Court, citing numerous grounds for federal jurisdiction and filing counterclaims. For the reasons explained below, the Court will remand all of the claims and counterclaims back to state court except for Ms. Booker’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- In Re Bulldog Trucking, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- UTrue, Inc. v. Page One Science, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Wittstadt v. ReyesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015