Legal Opinion

DeMauro v. DeMauro

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 8, 2002No. 2000-147PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

In this divorce proceeding, the defendant, Joseph M. DeMauro, appeals an order of the Superior Court {Murphy, J.) awarding the plaintiff, among other things, thirty-five million dollars in marital assets and alimony of twenty thousand dollars per month. He argues that the superior court’s valuation of the marital assets was erroneous because it relied upon remote and speculative evidence. The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the defendant remains in contempt of various superior court orders relating to the divorce action. Having carefully considered the parties’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Doe v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America v. 163 Pleasant Street Corporation, International Twist Drill (Holdings), Limited, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America v. 163 Pleasant Street CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. McVeigh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. MacPherson v. MacPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re NyhanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Hentsch Henchoz & Cie v. GubbayUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re RamadanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. Demauro v. DemauroSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. In re Schaulin-ViviersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API