Legal Opinion

Houck v. Kroger Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1977No. 1657PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order granting a temporary injunction.

In March 1968, appellee, The Kroger Company (Kroger) entered into a sale-leaseback agreement with Houck-Lister. Appellants (the Houcks) are the successors in interest to the Houck-Lister partnership. Under this agreement Houck-Lister purchased a shopping center development, containing at that time a Kroger and Super X store, a subsidiary of Kroger, at the corner of Westheimer and Voss Road in Houston, Houck-Lister, in turn, leased the Kroger and Super X space back to Kroger at a monthly rent of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Transport Co. of Texas v. Robertson TransportsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Zeidman v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Story v. StoryTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Inman v. PadrezasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Owens v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Camp Mystic, Inc. and Richard G. Eastland, Natural Fountains Properties, Inc. v. S. Stacy Eastland, Nancy Eastland Leaton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2012
  2. Gleason v. ComanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Forestpark Enterprises, Inc. v. CulpepperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Lawther v. Super X Drugs of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Maxwell Realty, Inc. v. MageeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API