Legal Opinion

United States v. Mikhel

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2006No. 06-50014PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

1. On interlocutory appeal, we have jurisdiction to hear claims of denial of privilege. United States v. Griffin, 440 F.3d 1138, 1141-42 (9th Cir.2006). Denial of a motion to suppress, however, is not an appealable final order. Carroll v. United States, 354 U.S. 394, 405, 77 S.Ct. 1332, 1 L.Ed.2d 1442 (1957); United States v. Becker, 929 F.2d 442, 444 (9th Cir.1991). Our jurisdiction to hear Mikhel’s claim regarding privilege cannot breathe life into his suppression claim. Cf. United States v. Woodson, 490 F.2d 1282, 1283 (9th Cir. 1973) (no jurisdiction to hear suppression…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Duskin Claude BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Herbert GurtnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. HenkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Robert Lee GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API