Legal Opinion
United States v. Henke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 25, 2000No. Nos. 99-10015, 99-10023PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge BEEZER.
2Per curiam
Chan Desaigoudar and Steven Henke, former executives of California Micro Devices, Inc. (“Cal Micro”), appeal their convictions for conspiracy to make false statements to the Securities Exchange Commission (18 U.S.C. § 371), making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001), securities fraud (15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78ff(a)), and insider trading (15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78ff(a)). The government cross-appeals the defendants’ sentences.
The defendants claim that their convictions must be set aside because a conflict of interest prevented their counsel from…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re Worlds Of Wonder Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by49 opinions
- Ex Parte McFarlandCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- United States v. GrafCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Boyd v. Comdata Network, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Oxy Resources California LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- United States v. Atul BhagatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.