Legal Opinion

Cummings Properties, LLC v. Empire Technologies, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 6, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, J.

This is a summary process action to recover possession of commercial premises and unpaid rent pursuant to a rent acceleration clause. Judgment for possession and damages in the amount of $20,263.77 was entered in favor of the plaintiff-landlord, Cummings Properties, LLC (“Cummings”). Cummings filed this Dist/Mun. Cts. R A D. A, Rule 8C, appeal of the trial judge’s denial of its requests for rulings of law pertaining to damages. Cummings’ position is that it was entitled to damages of $135,091.08, the amount due under the rent acceleration clause of the lease.

The original term of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Atkinson v. RosenthalMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Lumber Mutual Insurance v. Zoltek Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Kelly v. MarxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Amory v. ChecrouneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  2. Cummings Properties, LLC v. National Communications Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  3. DiBella v. FiumaraMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API