Amory v. Checroune

The defendant Alain Checroune (“Checroune”) appeals pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. RA.D.A, Rule 8C, the finding of the trial judge that Checroune is individually liable to the plaintiff, David Amory d/b/a David Amory Architects (“Amory”), for certain architectural fees. Specifically, Checroune asserts he cannot properly have been found liable because he was acting solely as an agent for a principal, the defendant corporation South Shore Realty, LLC (“South Shore”).1 We affirm the judgment in favor of Amory.

In a proposal letter of 29 October 1997 Amory sent to Checroune, Paul Atlan (“Atlan”), and…