Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion. Space will not permit an adequate presentation of the elaborate arguments submitted by opposing counsel.
1Opinion of the Court 1
245 U.S. 229
38 S.Ct. 65
62 L.Ed. 260
HITCHMAN COAL & COKE CO.
v.
MITCHELL et al.
No. 11.
Argued March 2 and 3, 1916.
Restored to Docket for Reargument March 13, 1916.
Reargued Dec. 15 and 18, 1916.
Decided Dec. 10, 1917.
[Syllabus from pages 229-232 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Hannis Taylor, of Washington, D. C., and Mr. George R. E. Gilchrist, of Wheeling, W. Va., for petitioner.
Mr. Charles E. Hogg, of Point Pleasant, W. Va., and Mr. Charles J. Hogg, of Charleston, W. Va., for respondents.
2Opinion of the Court · PitneyJustice Pitney
1
This was a suit in equity, commenced October 24, 1907, in the United States Circuit (afterwards District) Court for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- (PC) Arrant v. SantoroDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Dillingham v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Dillingham v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PC) Dillingham v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Hammler v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.