Legal Opinion

Carnes v. Ditzenberger

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1933No. 21644PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, O. J.

This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant in error, herein referred to as plaintiff. against plaintiff in error, in an action for damages growing out of a collision between two automobiles at a street intersection in the city of Tulsa.

In substance, plaintiff’s petition alleges that while his automobile was being driven by his son and agent south on Elwood street, at a point where it intersects Third street, and after it had entered such intersección, defendant carelessly, negligently; and recklessly drove his automobile into said intersection from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marland Refining Co. v. DuffySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Brennen v. AstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  4. Phoenix Ins. Co., Hartford, Conn. v. DiffieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  5. Fixico v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API