Legal Opinion

State v. Hull

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Clark Circuit Court. — Hoe. Edwin R. McKee, Judge. The defendant must be arranged, and a failure in this respect is reversible error. State v. Williams, 117 Mo. 379; State v. Hubbell, 55 Mo. App. 262; State v. Walker, 119 Mo. 467; State v. Geiger, 45 Id. Ill; State v. Haycroft, 49 Id. 488.

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

The defendant was charged of wife abandonment, tried by a jury, found guilty, and a judgment rendered against him on the verdict, from which he was duly appealed to this court.

No bill of exception was filed, hence the case is here upon the record proper. The pleadings by which an issue of fact is raised for trial by jury are a part of the record proper. In a criminal case the charge of guilt is made by the indictment or information; this fact is put in issue by the plea of not guilty; this plea under our practice is made upon an arraignment of the *301defendant and hearing of his plea in open…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. State v. GeigerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. State v. HubbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. State v. HaycroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LlewellynMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API