Legal Opinion
State v. Llewellyn
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Clark Circuit Court. — Hon. Edwin B. McKee, Judge. There was no arraignment, and this is sufficient cause for reversal. State v. Williams, 117 Mo. 379; State v.- Walker, 119 Mo. 467; State v. Hubbell, 55 Mo. App. 262; State v. Hull, 73 Mo. App. 30; State v. Grassle, 74 Mo. App. 313. The indictment does not charge nor does the evidence prove an •assault. State v. Sears, 86 Mo. 169.
1Opinion of the CourtEland, P. J.
Defendant was tried and convicted on the following indictment:
*470“We, the grand, jury for the State of Missouri, impaneled, sworn and charged to inquire within and for the body, of said county, upon our oath present and charge that on or about the tenth day of August, 1900, at the county of Clark, in the State of Missouri, one Dr. Geo. Llewellyn did then and there unlawfully, willfully and intentionally assault, strike, beat and wound one A. J. VanVelson, by then and there pointing a revolver at the said A. J. VanVelson in a rude and threatening manner, contrary to the statutes in such cases…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. DooleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. SearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- State v. EppersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
- State v. AmbroseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907