Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth Malcolm Riffe

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1977No. 76-4151PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Kenneth Riffe appeals the denial of a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P. He was convicted upon a plea of guilty to delivering cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and this court affirmed. See United States v. Riffe, 536 F.2d 1386 (5th Cir. 1976) (R. 21). Neither on direct appeal nor in the district court on his Rule 35 motion did appellant raise the issue of the invalidity of his guilty plea. He now asserts that the trial court failed correctly to perform its Rule 11 functions and that he was erroneously informed of a maximum penalty for the charged crime…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Errol B. ResnickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Robert Grene and Norman GradskyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Donald J. HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. William Budslow Potter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  5. United States v. Jerry Wayne HunterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Bernard HanyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Paul Lee ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Craig Leslie GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Paul Lee ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. RiffeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API