Matthews v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAZIL, J. pro tem. *
From a judgment in favor of the San Francisco Civil Service Commission and some individual defendants, the plaintiff employee, a member of the system, appeals. He sought in an action for declaratory relief to establish that he was entitled to an advance to a position available to one of his qualifications.
The situation requires, first, an explanation of the circumstances involved. The plaintiff was a civil service employee who at all times with which we are concerned stood at the head of the list of eligibles for the promotive position of J 10 Labor Sub-Foreman. 'On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Stockton Automobile Co. v. ConferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Pratt v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Kneeland v. Ethicon Suture Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.