Legal Opinion

Matthews v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1958No. Civ. 17755Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRAZIL, J. pro tem. *

From a judgment in favor of the San Francisco Civil Service Commission and some individual defendants, the plaintiff employee, a member of the system, appeals. He sought in an action for declaratory relief to establish that he was entitled to an advance to a position available to one of his qualifications.

The situation requires, first, an explanation of the circumstances involved. The plaintiff was a civil service employee who at all times with which we are concerned stood at the head of the list of eligibles for the promotive position of J 10 Labor Sub-Foreman. 'On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Stockton Automobile Co. v. ConferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Pratt v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kneeland v. Ethicon Suture Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API