Commonwealth v. Muscheck
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Packel, J.,
The appellant, convicted of possessing narcotic drugs, seeks a reversal on the ground that the search warrant was fatally ambiguous. We agree with the legal proposition that there must be a proper description of the premises to be searched, coupled of course with probable cause to search the designated premises. Commonwealth v. Copertino, 209 Pa. Superior Ct. 63, 224 A. 2d 228 (1966) ; Commonwealth v. Samolsky, 202 Pa. Superior Ct. 406, 195 A. 2d 818 (1963). The federal and state constitutional guarantees of freedom from unlawful searches prohibit a “rubber stamping”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmyserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. CopertinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. SamolskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MuscheckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. EastonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. EastonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. KaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. KaplanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.