Commonwealth v. Kaplan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion by
Hoffman, J.:
I concur in the result reached by the Majority. I feel that an additional word is necessary to make clear that the Court’s opinion does not erode the strict requirement of specificity necessary to validate a search warrant.
Article I, §8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides “. . . no warrant . . . shall issue without describing [any place or person to be seized] as nearly as may be. ... .” A frequent problem under §8 arises whenever the premises to be searched are located within a multiple-unit dwelling. Our Court has held a general description of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States of America Ex Rel. Edwin W. Gockley v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Commonwealth v. SmyserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. CopertinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. FioriniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.