Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1981No. Nos. 80-5005, 80-5130PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Appellant’s first amended complaint and action were dismissed by the district court on the grounds, first, that the action was barred by the Eleventh Amendment and, second, that the complaint did not allege a violation of appellant’s civil rights. Also, costs were taxed against appellant by the district court. Appellant appealed both the dismissal and the order with respect to costs. The appeals were consolidated.
We affirm the dismissal of the complaint and action as alleged in Count Four and a portion of Counts Three and Five. We reverse and remand with respect to Counts…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- L.R. Bretz v. Zollie Kelman, Jack R. Lande, Eugene R. WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil MaloneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- John W. Vicory v. Robert R. Walton, Sheriff of Butler County and John F. Holcomb, Butler County ProsecutorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.