Legal Opinion
Matzke v. Block
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1984No. Nos. 83-1866, 83-1867 and 83-2091PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
This is a class action brought by farmers living in Kansas who had received loans from the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) under the general Farm and Rural Development Act. The FmHA had security interests in plaintiffs’ homes, crops, livestock and equipment.
Plaintiffs assert that the Secretary of Agriculture has taken no action to place in operation or to implement the remedies provided for them by 7 U.S.C. § 1981a (Pub.L. No. 95-334, § 122) and has refused to do so. They assert that no regulations, procedures, or standards have been adopted by the Secretary as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aqua Products, Inc. v. MatalCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Inez Curry and Remer Curry v. John R. Block, Etc., James McLeod Rowell v. Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Matzke v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Curry v. BlockDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1985
- Lathan v. BlockDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.