Legal Opinion

Brownell v. White Motor Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1971PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff Brownell, the owner of a truck, and the plaintiff Brander, as a representative of Lloyd’s London, insurers of the truck, brought this products liability action for damage to the truck incurred when it went off the road. The defendant Freightliner manufactured the truck; the defendant White Motor sold the truck to a dealer who, in turn, sold it to Brownell. The cause went to the jury upon the theory of strict liability. The defendants appeal a judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict for the plaintiffs.

The defendants contend that the trial court erred in not finding for them as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing & Rental ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Jakubowski v. Minnesota Mining and ManufacturingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Wights v. Staff Jennings, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Technical Chemical Company v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U. S. A., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Scanlon v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Shirley J. Lindsay, of the Estate of John Douglas Lindsay, Deceased v. McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. Farmer v. International Harvester CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API