Legal Opinion

United States v. Kreitzer

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 6, 1953No. 1039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Geoege W. Latimer, Judge:

This cause came before us on a petition for review which set out various assignments of error alleging irregularities in the trial of the case. Subsequently, a supplemental petition was filed in which the accused contended he was tried a second time for the same offense contrary to Article 44 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 619. We granted review, limiting our consideration to the issue specified in the supplemental petition.

Briefly, the facts and circumstances which are not all in the record proper but which we accept as accurate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  2. Curtis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Bracey v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  4. United States ex rel. Poch v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  5. McCelvey v. Fulgham (In Re Fulgham)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. TroglinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. SchillingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. TubbsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API