United States v. Harwood
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1DissentCrawford, Judge
Because the majority opinion appears to be inconsistent with our prior case law on multiplicity and waiver, I dissent.
Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, appellant agreed to plead guilty to “[a]ll Charges and specifications.” She also agreed that “[m]y counsel have fully advised me of the nature of the charges and specifications ... and the effect of the guilty plea____”
When appellant was advised that any motions to dismiss or grant other relief should be made prior to the plea, individual defense counsel responded that there would be a motion for “multiplicity for sentencing, which does not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. OatneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. RodriquezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.