Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Harwood

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided February 20, 1997No. 96-0105; Crim App. No. 31163Published

1DissentCrawford, Judge

Because the majority opinion appears to be inconsistent with our prior case law on multiplicity and waiver, I dissent.

Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, appellant agreed to plead guilty to “[a]ll Charges and specifications.” She also agreed that “[m]y counsel have fully advised me of the nature of the charges and specifications ... and the effect of the guilty plea____”

When appellant was advised that any motions to dismiss or grant other relief should be made prior to the plea, individual defense counsel responded that there would be a motion for “multiplicity for sentencing, which does not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. OatneyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. RodriquezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API