Sewell v. Cherokee County Bank

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The only question presented for review on this appeal is the action of the trial court in refusing the defendants’ motion for a new trial. The appellant Sewell contends that the evidence, or the great weight of same, shows that he was an innocent purchaser of the mule, in that the description of the mule in the recorded mortgage was so variant from the mule he bought as not to charge him with constructive notice. There was such conflict in the evidence as to the description of the mule as to make the identity of the one bought with the one described in the mortgage a…