Lillich v. Moore
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Walker. Tried before .the Hon. James J. Banks. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The assignments of error being made by all the appellants, and there being no' error of which the appellant, D. McDonald, can complain, the assignments of error will be disregarded.— Beach,man v. Aurora, &c., Manfg. Co., 110 Ala. 555 ; Kimhrell v. Rogers, 90 Ala. 339 ; Rudulphv. Brewer, 96 Ala. 189.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.
Moore instituted a statutory contest of the election of Lillich, McDonald, Tipper and Townly to the Board of Aldermen of the town of Carbon Hill. At the hearing before the circuit judge there was judgment in favor of McDonald and against the other three contestees, Lillich, Tipper and Townly. That judgment has been brought here on appeal by all four of the contestees, Lillich, McDonald, Tipper and Townly; and they jointly, as appellants, assign the errors supposed to have been committed by the court below. It is clear that whatever errors may have been committed, they, in no sense or degree,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kimbrell v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Rudulph v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Beachman v. Aurora Silver Plate Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- Chavers v. MayoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Bowling v. Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Lehman v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Mobile Temperance Hall Ass'n v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Adams v. BibbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.