Legal Opinion
Seda v. Seda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a matrimonial action in which the parties *476were divorced by a judgment dated March 12, 1998, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), dated December 24, 1998, as granted the plaintiffs cross motion for an upward modification of child support.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the cross motion is denied.
It is well settled that the parties to a separation agreement may “opt out” of the provisions of the Child Support Standards Act (hereinafter the CSSA)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Merl v. MerlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sloam v. SloamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Bill v. BillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Leroy v. LeroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Schaller v. SchallerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mauriello v. MaurielloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rosenberg v. ErberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Paul v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003