Legal Opinion

United States v. Barrows

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 19, 1954No. Crim. No. 826PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

A criminal Information was filed against Raymond R. Barrows and H. Damon Musser, employers under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, Title 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219. It is charged they were guilty of violations for the period beginning April 1, 1950 and ending March 7, 1952, at Seaford, Delaware. Defendants were manufacturers of women’s full fashioned nylon hosiery. Defendants are said to be em*325ployers under § 3(d) of the Act. Violations of §§ 7(a), 11(a), 11(c), and 15(a) (1), (2) and (5), are charged. The Information sets forth four unlawful courses of conduct:1

1…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. CasertaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. Fredrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. United States v. Greater Kansas City Retail Coal Merchants' Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
  5. United States v. FosterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API